Case study · Change management

Bringing AI to a small team

A small property management team had several overlapping AI tools and no rules for using them. I wrote the policy, chose one standard tool, connected it to our systems and trained everyone, then used it myself to build the company's first internal apps.

RoleLead and trainer
WhenApr – Oct 2026
ToolsClaude, Notion AI, Slack
AudienceWhole company
1
standard AI tool, replacing several add-ons
~25
working prototypes
2
production apps built with AI
~95
tools and pages published in 7 weeks

The problem

People were paying for several AI add-ons, using them inconsistently, and unsure what was allowed with tenant and owner data.

Constraints

Tight budget

Every tool had to justify its cost; consolidating was part of the point.

Sensitive data

Tenant, owner and financial data needed clear rules.

Mixed comfort

Some staff were enthusiastic, some wary.

Key decisions

1

Policy before tools.

I wrote an AI use policy covering what data can go where, before rolling anything out.

2

One standard tool.

We standardised on Claude, connected it to our core systems and cut overlapping add-ons.

3

Train on real work.

The company-wide session used the team's own tasks, followed by a tips channel and office hours, because one training isn't adoption.

4

Guardrails in everything I built.

A person approves every payment, each app has limited access, and I measure accuracy on real data before anyone relies on a tool.

When one matcher wasn't accurate enough, I kept it advisory rather than automatic.

How it works

Policywhat data, where
→
One toolconnected to systems
→
Trainingcompany-wide, May 20
→
Supporttips channel + office hours
→
Buildingapps with guardrails
Adoption was treated as a sequence, not an event.

Outcome

“Great job today! … I think it was really valuable!” — CEO, after the company-wide training

What I'd do differently